Your Cloud Perimeter Security Decision:
CSP Native Firewalls or Specialized Security Vendor Firewalls

As organizations continue to migrate their operations to the cloud, the importance of robust  perimeter security becomes increasingly critical. With the evolving threat landscape, businesses  face the challenge of choosing between Cloud Service Provider (CSP) native firewalls and  specialized security vendor firewalls. This article explores the options available, evaluates their  security effectiveness, and argues for the necessity of advanced threat intelligence in making an  informed decision. 

Understanding the Options 

CSP Native Firewalls 

Major cloud providers like Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud  Platform (GCP) offer integrated firewall solutions tailored to their respective environments. These  native firewalls are designed to provide basic protection while leveraging the cloud provider’s  infrastructure. 

  • AWS Network Firewall: AWS offers a managed firewall service that provides fine-grained  control over network traffic. It integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, allowing  users to define rules based on IP addresses, protocols, and ports. 
  • Azure Firewall: Microsoft Azure provides a cloud-native firewall with built-in high  availability and scalability. It includes features such as application and network-level  filtering, threat intelligence-based filtering, and integration with Azure Monitor for logging  and analytics. 
  • Google Cloud Firewall: Google Cloud’s firewall rules allow users to control traffic to and  from instances in their Virtual Private Cloud (VPC). It supports both ingress and egress  rules and is integrated with Google’s security services for enhanced protection. 

These CSP native firewalls are often chosen for their ease of deployment and management within  their respective ecosystems. However, they may not always provide the advanced features  necessary for comprehensive security. 

Specialized Security Vendor Firewalls 

In contrast, specialized security vendors offer robust firewall solutions that can be deployed  across various cloud platforms. These firewalls are designed to provide advanced security  capabilities beyond what CSP native offerings typically include. 

  • Palo Alto Networks: Known for its next-generation firewalls, Palo Alto Networks offers  cloud-native solutions that provide advanced threat prevention, application visibility, and  granular control over traffic. 
  • Fortinet: Fortinet’s FortiGate firewalls deliver comprehensive security features such as  intrusion prevention systems (IPS), web filtering, and VPN capabilities. They can be deployed in multi-cloud environments, providing consistent security policies across  platforms.
  • Check Point: Check Point offers cloud security solutions that include advanced threat  prevention technologies, allowing organizations to protect their cloud workloads with  high levels of effectiveness. 

These specialized firewalls are often preferred by organizations with stringent security  requirements due to their advanced capabilities and flexibility across different environments. 

Evaluating Security Effectiveness 

When deciding between CSP native firewalls and specialized vendor firewalls, the primary  evaluation parameter should be security effectiveness. This encompasses how well a firewall  can detect and prevent threats based on its architecture, capabilities, and quality of threat  intelligence feeds. Afterall it is a security investment, and you are looking at maximum risk  mitigation. 

Security Architecture 

The architecture of a firewall plays a crucial role in its effectiveness: 

  • CSP Native Firewalls: Typically designed for ease of integration within the CSP  ecosystem, these firewalls may lack advanced features such as deep packet inspection  (DPI) or sophisticated intrusion prevention systems (IPS). While they provide basic  filtering capabilities, they may not be equipped to handle complex threats effectively. 
  • Specialized Security Vendor Firewalls: These solutions are built with a focus on  comprehensive security architectures that include multiple layers of protection. They  often incorporate advanced technologies like machine learning algorithms for anomaly  detection, behavioural analysis, and automated response mechanisms that enhance  their overall effectiveness against sophisticated attacks. 

Capabilities Comparison 

A detailed comparison of capabilities reveals significant differences between CSP native  firewalls and specialized vendor solutions:

Feature  CSP Native Firewalls  Specialized Vendor Firewalls
Deep Packet Inspection (DPI)  Limited or absent  Comprehensive DPI available
Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS)  Basic functionality  Advanced IPS with real-time updates
Threat Intelligence Integration  Basic threat intelligence  Extensive threat intelligence feeds
Granular Policy Control  Moderate  Highly granular
Automated Response Mechanisms  Limited  Advanced automation capabilities

Quality of Threat Intelligence Feeds 

The quality of threat intelligence is a key attribute that determines the effectiveness of any  security product. High-quality threat intelligence enables firewalls to proactively identify  emerging threats and respond accordingly. 

  • CSP Native Firewalls: While some CSPs integrate basic threat intelligence into their  offerings, these feeds may not be as comprehensive or timely as those provided by  specialized vendors. This limitation can hinder the firewall’s ability to defend against new  attack vectors effectively. 
  • Specialized Vendor Firewalls: Leading security vendors invest heavily in gathering real time threat intelligence from various sources. This includes global monitoring networks,  research teams analysing emerging threats, and collaboration with other cybersecurity  entities. As a result, these firewalls can adapt quickly to new threats and provide more  effective protection. 

The Dynamic Threat Landscape 

In today’s fast-paced cybersecurity environment, threats evolve rapidly. Attackers constantly  develop new techniques to bypass traditional defences. Therefore, organizations require firewalls  that can not only respond to current threats but also anticipate future ones. Specialised security  vendors are better equipped to build robust firewalls that adapt continuously through: 

  1. Regular Updates: Specialized vendors frequently update their products based on the  latest threat intelligence. This ensures that their firewalls remain effective against newly  discovered vulnerabilities. 
  2. Research and Development: Leading vendors invest in R&D to enhance detection  algorithms continually. This commitment allows them to refine their technologies based  on real-world attack data. 
  3. Community Collaboration: Many specialized vendors collaborate with industry partners  to share insights about emerging threats. This collaborative approach enhances their  understanding of the threat landscape and improves their products’ effectiveness. 

 

A recent study conducted by CyberRatings evaluated the effectiveness of native cloud firewalls  from major CSPs—AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform—using Keysight’s CyPerf  v5.0 testing platform. The results indicated that: 

  • The block rates for these native solutions ranged from 0.38% to 50.57%. Overall performance was notably low across all tested providers. 
  • The study concluded that organizations relying solely on CSP native firewalls  might be accepting reduced security effectiveness compared to third-party  solutions 

Summary and Conclusion 

In conclusion, organizations must carefully evaluate their perimeter security options when  deploying cloud infrastructure. While CSP native firewalls offer ease of integration and management within specific environments, they often fall short in terms of security effectiveness  compared to specialized vendor solutions. The evaluation should prioritize: 

  • Security architecture 
  • Capabilities 
  • Quality of threat intelligence feeds 

 

Given the dynamic nature of cyber threats today, relying solely on CSP native firewalls could  expose organizations to significant risks due to their limited detection capabilities and slower  adaptation to emerging threats. For decision-makers tasked with securing cloud assets, investing  in specialized vendor firewalls is likely a more prudent choice—one that aligns better with the  need for comprehensive protection against sophisticated cyber threats. By leveraging robust  threat intelligence combined with advanced detection algorithms from specialized vendors,  organizations can enhance their overall security posture while ensuring that critical workloads  remain protected in an increasingly complex digital landscape. 

Since you’re here… At VFM, we are committed to helping businesses secure their digital future. Explore how our  tailored IT infrastructure and cybersecurity solutions can empower your enterprise to achieve  more. 

Our team is here to collaborate with you, whether it’s through tailored solutions, expert advice, or  impactful partnerships. From strengthening your IT ecosystem to driving innovation, let’s work  together to build resilient systems for tomorrow. 

Here’s How You Can Engage with Us:

  • Stay Connected: Follow our latest updates, insights, and events on LinkedIn.
  • Collaborate with Us: Partner with us to enhance your IT infrastructure or cybersecurity systems.

Let’s work together to drive success and secure your enterprise.
Contact Us | Explore Our Services